Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A68M-HD+ (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190213
Uptime	8.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '21 at 18:44
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 845-$50 6,391 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	50.8% Above average	Memory 63.4 1-Core 70.5 2-Core 110 50% 81.5 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 224 30% 223 Pts	64-Core 221 14% 221 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188 42,397 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Gainward(10B0 0401) 2GB CLim: 822 MHz, MLim: 1002 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Lighting 18.7 Reflection 26 Parallax 17.7 15% 20.8 fps	MRender 26.9 Gravity 20.6 Splatting 20.9 18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 18%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
JAJS300M240C 240GB 1,437 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0529A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 186 8.5 20 125 29 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 427 Write 362 Mixed 350 SusWrite 66.5 67% 301 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 66.2 4K Mixed 16.3 97% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 89.9 DQ Write 225 DQ Mixed 0.7 45% 105 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 111%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 194GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 143 155 161 160 158 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 147 Write 138 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 156 85% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 137% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-1333C9-4GNS F3-10666CL9-4GBNT 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.6% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 8.1 MC Mixed 14.3 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 9.6 23% 8.17 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 37: 4R 3G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
37%	18%	83	170	123	60	23.5"	1920 1080	SAM0D2C C24F390

History: Score 33: 4R 2G 7B | Score 37: 4R 3G 8B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 45%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	38x
Athlon X4 845AMD $50Bench 45%, 6,391 samples	27x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	23x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	32x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	19x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	16x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	14x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	5x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	8x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	7x
RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 6,575 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $30

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16