Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H110M-DS2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF (all builds)
Memory	14.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161116
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '21 at 18:05
Run Duration	578 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	63.4% Good	Memory 67.8 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 202 68% 123 Pts	4-Core 318 8-Core 479 50% 398 Pts	64-Core 553 34% 553 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 90%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Lighting 20.8 Reflection 27.1 Parallax 35.4 17% 27.8 fps	MRender 34.3 Gravity 30.8 Splatting 26.4 24% 30.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 21%
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Palit(1569 1187) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.4% Poor	Lighting 29.8 Reflection 31.9 Parallax 38.5 24% 33.4 fps	MRender 41.2 Gravity 38.7 Splatting 33.5 30% 37.8 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 28%
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	5.96% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 0.2 6% 3.8 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 6.5 Splatting 11.3 6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.96% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050V 500GB 5,167 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 273GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 9 7.6 4.2 6.4 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	2.33% Terrible	Read 2.2 Write 0.5 Mixed 3.2 SusWrite 5.9 2% 2.95 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 2.33% Great: 62%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70 11,781 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 878GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 110 117 116 117 111 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 113 Write 116 Mixed 67.2 SusWrite 115 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 104%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 915GB free Firmware: 1U SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 84 85 86 85 84 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	44.5% Average	Read 70 Write 85.8 Mixed 34.1 SusWrite 85.1 50% 68.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 62%
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB 7,781 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 5GB free, PID 0302 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.9 8.5 7.7 8.7 8.5 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	8.44% Terrible	Read 24.2 Write 7.7 Mixed 8 SusWrite 6.8 13% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.9 75% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 8.44% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMV8GX4M1A2133C15 0A94 D4R16GL24A8R 24GB 2133, 2400 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	29.2% Poor	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 8.9 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 7.5 SC Mixed 5.4 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 107 38% 107 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 26: 5R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
26%	22%	27	147	40	60	21.5"	1920 1080	HIK0000 DS-D5022QE-C

History: Score 4: 0R 1G 1B | Score 26: 5R 0G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 2,339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-DS2-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	360x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	290x
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	213x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	303x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	169x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	145x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	116x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	42x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	40x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	45x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	31x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $182

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16