Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics3.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT270E5V-KD5S
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '15 at 23:49
Run Duration337 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 140
52% 112 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 228
30% 228 Pts
64-Core 224
14% 224 Pts
Poor: 30% Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C708) 1.5GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3958
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
3.47% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.15
Parallax 2.69
3% 3.91 fps
MRender 4.05
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 7.48
4% 4.58 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.47%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 64GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 365
Write 59.3
Mixed 60.4
34% 162 MB/s
4K Read 2.72
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 5.27
27% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 35.3
DQ Mixed 29
43% 84.5 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 63%
SanDisk 32GB
17GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
8.99% Terrible
Read 20.2
Write 3.17
Mixed 6.84
10% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.62
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 1.07
100% 2.05 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.99%
Great: 9%
Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV/2470EE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $128
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback