MSI Z270 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A68)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7A68
MotherboardMSI Z270 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A68)  (all builds)
Memory28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 15:12
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 137
2-Core 272
92% 166 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 432
56% 423 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 84A1) 2GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
35.4% Below average
Lighting 41.2
Reflection 37.8
Parallax 53.4
34% 44.1 fps
MRender 55.4
Gravity 50.7
Splatting 40.3
39% 48.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5 Pro 128GB-$130
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 260 279 293 281 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
51.2% Above average
Read 487
Write 316
Mixed 268
SusWrite 273
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0
57% 14 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 98%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 256GB
169GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 35 35 36 45 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 314
Write 114
Mixed 226
SusWrite 66.2
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 41.1
154% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 198
168% 244 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 102%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 256GB
110GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 35 36 36 44 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 448
Write 393
Mixed 333
SusWrite 66
69% 310 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 40.5
157% 54.1 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 220
193% 286 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84%
Great: 102%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
203GB free
Firmware: CP100-12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 55 55 56 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
29% Poor
Read 45.4
Write 61.4
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 55.3
37% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29%
Great: 43%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
302GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 101 104 101 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 95.5
Write 108
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 102
67% 91 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D30BESB.16FD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
85% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 33
MC Mixed 27.5
87% 30.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 25.4
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 85%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ78E6 GW2780
Typical Z270 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A68) Builds (Compare 1,728 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht

Motherboard: MSI Z270 TOMAHAWK (MS-7A68) - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $640
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback