Casper PRO DT N200

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	7.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Casper PRO DT N200 (all builds)
Motherboard	CASPER H410M H 001
Memory	3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200616
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '21 at 14:48
Run Duration	255 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70 39,812 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 87 1-Core 129 2-Core 226 84% 147 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 603 63% 503 Pts	64-Core 645 40% 645 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Sapphire(1DA2 E348) 2GB CLim: 1196 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.9.2 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	7.92% Terrible	Lighting 0.3 Reflection 28 Parallax 39.4 0% 22.6 fps	MRender 27.4 Gravity 31.8 Splatting 25.3 23% 28.2 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 7.92% Great: 25%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB 7,893 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 283GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA15.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 196 210 194 116 116 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 406 Write 373 Mixed 323 SusWrite 189 72% 323 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 28.8 101% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 247 DQ Write 233 DQ Mixed 170 147% 217 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 898GB free Firmware: AX0A3M SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 107 108 107 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 79.7 Write 102 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 107 58% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FN 1x8GB 353 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.9% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 11.5 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 12.2 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 70.5 57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	144	23.5"	1280 720	AOC2401 24G1WG4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRO DT N200 Builds (Compare 328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

System: Casper PRO DT N200

CPU
Core i5-10400Intel $130Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	43x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	38x
Core i5-11400FIntel $116Bench 94%, 46,609 samples	36x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	28x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	27x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	23x

SSD
SATA SSD 240GBKioxia-exceriaBench 72%, 4,923 samples	53x
SSD 500GBKioxia-exceriaBench 175%, 10,941 samples	40x
SATA SSD 480GBKioxia-exceriaBench 78%, 7,893 samples	31x

RAM
CT8G4DFRA32A.M8FR 2x8GBCrucialBench 86%, 1,251 samples	17x
CT8G4DFRA266.C8FN 1x8GBCrucialBench 44%, 353 samples	17x
CT8G4DFRA266.C4FE 1x8GBCrucialBench 38%, 314 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 93% - Outstanding

Total price: $260

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16