Asus P5K-VM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5K-VM  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080118
Uptime7.7 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 10:08
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
36% Below average
Memory 57.1
1-Core 26.1
2-Core 51.7
31% 45 Pts
4-Core 89.6
8-Core 87.3
12% 88.4 Pts
64-Core 86.8
5% 86.8 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.7
Reflection 17.9
Parallax 18.6
14% 18.1 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 17.2
14% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 120GB 120GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 113 87 77 61 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.9% Poor
Read 150
Write 112
Mixed 115
SusWrite 85.5
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 24
4K Mixed 13.2
58% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 20.3
DQ Write 31.4
DQ Mixed 22.2
18% 24.6 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 86%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
181GB free
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 73 83 94 92 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 38.7
Write 72.8
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 87.6
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
75% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.8
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 3.1
SC Mixed 4
10% 3.5 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 7R 3G 11B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 4% 512 166 110 60 21.5" 1920 1080 SAM0D1A S22F350
History: Score 35: 5R 2G 4B | Score 55: 7R 3G 11B
Typical P5K-VM Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5K-VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback