Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Razer CH20
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 04:59
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User PRY-User
Background CPU 28%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 90.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 248
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 741
77% 618 Pts
64-Core 946
59% 946 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.35% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 89.1
Parallax 7.8
6% 34.5 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 1
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.35%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D512 512GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C490903
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 335 417 429 376 403 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,575
Write 1,534
Mixed 1,253
SusWrite 396
266% 1,189 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 67
222% 74.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,174
DQ Write 900
DQ Mixed 895
708% 989 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 202%
Great: 228%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
412GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 38 39 39 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 36.1
Write 36
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 38.1
48% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
158% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905711-038.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
67.2% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 18.7
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 23.7
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD05C0
Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,024 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback