Huawei NBLB-WAX9N

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 78% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Huawei NBLB-WAX9N (all builds)
Motherboard	HUAWEI NBLB-WAX9N-PCB
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs, , 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210427
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 25 '21 at 02:14
Run Duration	244 Seconds
Run User	DZA-User
Background CPU	0%
CPU Throttled	78%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10510U 51,080 User benchmarks, average bench 56% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 139 2-Core 216 86% 148 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 360 40% 318 Pts	64-Core 318 20% 318 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Quanta(152D 1260) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9894 Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	3.3% Terrible	Lighting 5.8 Reflection 18.6 Parallax 7.2 5% 10.5 fps	MRender 1 Gravity 1 Splatting 0.2 0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.3% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G-1027 512GB 4,494 User benchmarks, average bench 206% 396GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1077 979 950 935 957 1003 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	247% Outstanding	Read 1,898 Write 1,359 Mixed 1,355 SusWrite 984 313% 1,399 MB/s	4K Read 51.3 4K Write 168 4K Mixed 74.5 262% 97.8 MB/s	DQ Read 850 DQ Write 494 DQ Mixed 651 490% 665 MB/s
Poor: 145% ↑ This bench: 247% Great: 262%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GB 20,634 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.6% Good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 25.5 MC Mixed 19.8 69% 24 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 29.4 SC Mixed 23.5 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 53: 8R 4G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
53%	42%	31	210	151	60	20"	1600 900	ACR0220 Acer V203HV

History: Score 27: 3R 3G 3B | Score 39: 6R 3G 0B | Score 53: 8R 4G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NBLB-WAX9N Builds (Compare 856 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Huawei NBLB-WAX9N

CPU
Core i5-10210UIntelBench 53%, 54,859 samples	639x
Core i3-10110UIntelBench 47%, 11,481 samples	114x
Core i7-10510UIntelBench 56%, 51,080 samples	103x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples	789x
GeForce MX250NvidiaBench 14%, 8,806 samples	67x

SSD
311CD0512GB 512GBBench 154%, 1,396 samples	163x
PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G-1027 512GBWDCBench 206%, 4,494 samples	145x
TOSHIBA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 202%, 3,703 samples	130x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 2x4GBMicronBench 68%, 16,220 samples	183x
K4A8G165WC-BCTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 63%, 1,724 samples	158x
MT40A512M16LY-075:E 2x4GBMicronBench 63%, 974 samples	146x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16