PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 72GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 72GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision WorkStation T7500 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0M1GJ6 |
Memory | 63.3 GB free of 72 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110722 |
Uptime | 3.7 Days |
Run Date | Sep 25 '21 at 00:40 |
Run Duration | 330 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690
CPU1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
77.7%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K4000
Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 461.40
|
12.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Asus(1043 841A) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 52 59 55 26 14 MB/s
|
26.2%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
205GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 108 107 106 109 MB/s
|
60.8%
Good
|
|||
Seagate ST3400620NS 400GB-$179
148GB free
Firmware: 3.AEG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 61 61 56 26 17 MB/s
|
29.7%
Poor
|
|||
Seagate ST3400620NS 400GB-$179
62GB free
Firmware: 3.AEG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 48 47 48 48 MB/s
|
28.9%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$37
114GB free
Firmware: 1H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 105 105 105 105 MB/s
|
56.5%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 72GB
null MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
59.2%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25% | 14% | 77 | 61 | 6 | 60 | 24.1" | 1920 1200 | HWP284C LA2405 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples | 163x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 88x |
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples | 74x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 61x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 54x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 51x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |