Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121017
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '21 at 23:23
Run Duration	375 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8120 25,690 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	59.6% Above average	Memory 86.8 1-Core 62.6 2-Core 108 55% 85.8 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 303 29% 241 Pts	64-Core 318 20% 318 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Palit(1569 1187) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1550 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Lighting 31.5 Reflection 32.6 Parallax 41.8 26% 35.3 fps	MRender 43.5 Gravity 40.7 Splatting 33.7 32% 39.3 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 132GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 287 304 297 320 257 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 417 Write 380 Mixed 304 SusWrite 288 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 26.1 4K Write 42.4 4K Mixed 31.3 102% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 150 DQ Write 116 DQ Mixed 137 102% 134 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 124%
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49 13,478 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 408GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 293 315 306 129 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 421 Write 379 Mixed 321 SusWrite 220 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 19.6 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 27.1 87% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 133 103% 142 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 108%
P3-1TB 1TB 2,113 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 407GB free Firmware: T170 SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 294 316 307 348 265 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	66% Good	Read 396 Write 398 Mixed 314 SusWrite 299 79% 352 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 40 4K Mixed 22.3 83% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 157 DQ Write 133 DQ Mixed 122 98% 137 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 66% Great: 105%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 37GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 101 101 101 101 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	60.5% Good	Read 110 Write 103 Mixed 84.9 SusWrite 100 74% 99.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 76%
SAMSUNG HD400LD 400GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 80GB free, PID 6830 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 6.8 6.8 6.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 17%
ST3000LM 024-2AN17R 802GB 1.5TB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 24 23 24 22 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	18.6% Very poor	Read 24.1 Write 26.7 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 22.9 34% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.63 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 10.2 32% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 10.3 26% 8.93 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 20: 1R 4G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
20%	26%	31	250	149	60	23"	1920 1080	ACR009A X233H

History: Score 19: 2R 2G 3B | Score 18: 2R 1G 5B | Score 20: 2R 1G 7B | Score 20: 1R 4G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16