| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67 (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110223 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 24 '21 at 18:41 |
| Run Duration | 155 Seconds |
| Run User | COL-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.7%
Good
|
60% 96.4 Pts
|
26% 197 Pts
|
13% 205 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Device(105B 0DCC) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2219
|
0.78%
Terrible
|
1% 1.43 fps
|
1% 1.03 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung HD200HJ 200GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KF100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 46 44 15 42 46 MB/s
|
23.4%
Poor
|
33% 44.9 MB/s
|
110% 0.77 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
915GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 164 161 164 165 164 MB/s
|
92.2%
Outstanding
|
94% 129 MB/s
|
183% 1.3 MB/s
| |
|
VendorCo ProductCode 8GB
1GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 3.4 2.6 2.4 1.8 2.9 MB/s
|
4.2%
Terrible
|
9% 8.7 MB/s
|
10% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.3%
Poor
|
24% 8.37 GB/s
|
24% 8.43 GB/s
|
59% 67.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H67M-S/H67M-V/H67 Builds (Compare 93 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Foxconn H67M-S/H67M-V/H67
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 22x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 16x |
| Core i3-2100Intel $49Bench 51%, 63,701 samples | 16x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 17x |
| GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 9x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $197 |