PC Intel Z370

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	PC Intel Z370 (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z370 AORUS ULTRA GAMING 2.0-CF
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180704
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '21 at 18:32
Run Duration	247 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	50%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8600K-$173 264,837 User benchmarks, average bench 91% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 94.1 1-Core 118 2-Core 184 79% 132 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 423 45% 359 Pts	64-Core 442 27% 442 Pts
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	118% Outstanding	Lighting 159 Reflection 176 Parallax 166 130% 167 fps	MRender 126 Gravity 166 Splatting 116 110% 136 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2256 Write 911 Mixed 1,185 318% 1,451 MB/s	4K Read 55.4 4K Write 135 4K Mixed 73.4 249% 87.8 MB/s	DQ Read 976 DQ Write 921 DQ Mixed 982 728% 959 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 145GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 144 148 147 149 151 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Read 152 Write 157 Mixed 83.9 SusWrite 143 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GD3000C15K4 2x8GB 5,197 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	67% Good	MC Read 23.1 MC Write 22.7 MC Mixed 22.3 65% 22.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 25.4 SC Mixed 23.9 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 59.7 67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 80: 10R 10G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
80%	40%	50	300	228	144	24"	1920 1080	BNQ7F31 BenQ XL2411Z

History: Score 43: 5R 4G 6B | Score 66: 9R 7G 0B | Score 80: 10R 10G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Intel Z370 Builds (Compare 1,208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 91%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

System: PC Intel Z370

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	300x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	221x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	192x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	118x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	105x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	92x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	74x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	54x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	32x

RAM
CM4X8GD3200C16K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 89%, 9,947 samples	74x
CM4X8GF2400Z16K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 73%, 4,992 samples	74x
CM4X8GD3000C15K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 83%, 5,197 samples	71x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $671

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16