Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime6.8 Days
Run DateSep 24 '21 at 17:22
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
64% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 109
56% 88.1 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 460
44% 362 Pts
64-Core 461
28% 461 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 64%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 051D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
9.68% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 33.9
Parallax 0.2
0% 11.4 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 0
Splatting 43.2
28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 9.68%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 159 164 150 143 137 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 443
Mixed 370
SusWrite 182
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 46.7
155% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 282
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 262
197% 263 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
555GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 130 134 124 129 129 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 180
Write 162
Mixed 87.4
SusWrite 130
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.2
220% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
134GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 107 98 96 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 127
Write 63.2
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 101
67% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 11.8
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 82
49% 82 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 581 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback