Intel X79Turbo

Performance Results


Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Intel X79
Motherboard	Intel X79Turbo (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1360 x 765 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210528
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '21 at 12:38
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	35%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0 6,987 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 68.7 2-Core 174 65% 111 Pts	4-Core 348 8-Core 598 57% 473 Pts	64-Core 880 54% 880 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below potential (91^st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (41 fps cap detected)	31.8% Below average	Lighting 40.9 Reflection 42.8 Parallax 40.8 33% 41.5 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 41.3 Splatting 28.9 29% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB 7,332 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: U0324A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 47 45 42 46 48 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	35.9% Below average	Read 428 Write 360 Mixed 229 SusWrite 63.2 60% 270 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 1.1 32% 12.8 MB/s	DQ Read 85.5 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 22.4 52% 104 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 93%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49 47,332 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 2GB free Firmware: 0001SDM5 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 52.7 Write 42.5 Mixed 41.5 34% 45.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 3x4GB 90 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 3 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	76.2% Very good	MC Read 32.7 MC Write 28.5 MC Mixed 27.5 84% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.5 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 9.4 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	46	312	268	60	32"	1360 765	MST0030 MStar Demo

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79Turbo Builds (Compare 256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Intel X79Turbo

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	94x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	44x
Xeon E5-2690 0IntelBench 71%, 4,842 samples	16x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	18x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	17x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	6x
NE-256 256GBBench 159%, 6,044 samples	6x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	76x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	16x
M393B5170GB0- 3x4GBSamsungBench 73%, 90 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16