Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 30% Sail boat	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	29.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201203
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '21 at 09:58
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	Memory 77.8 1-Core 151 2-Core 297 94% 175 Pts	4-Core 560 8-Core 898 89% 729 Pts	64-Core 1,404 87% 1,404 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8626) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.6% Poor	Lighting 37.3 Reflection 41.9 Parallax 38.8 30% 39.3 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 39.5 Splatting 27.9 28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Addlink M.2 PCIE G3x4 NVMe 256GB 2,095 User benchmarks, average bench 163% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM32.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 605 Write 837 Mixed 339 133% 594 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 164 4K Mixed 39.8 192% 80 MB/s	DQ Read 426 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 328 252% 347 MB/s
Poor: 96% Great: 235%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB 18,723 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 81 81 78 77 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 50.2 Write 85.2 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 78.9 50% 67.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB 707 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	81.7% Excellent	MC Read 31.7 MC Write 23.9 MC Mixed 31.4 83% 29 GB/s	SC Read 23.8 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 33.6 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 84.7 47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 132%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	60	27"	1280 720	ACI27C3 MX279

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 2,324 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $152Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	783x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	552x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	162x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	244x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	223x
RTX 3060Nvidia $274Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	220x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	121x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	118x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	80x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	94x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	64x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $691

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16