Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 116%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive164% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory54.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 24 '21 at 08:33
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 83.3
1-Core 150
2-Core 298
96% 177 Pts
4-Core 572
8-Core 996
95% 784 Pts
64-Core 2,000
124% 2,000 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
Gigabyte(1458 37C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 155
Reflection 161
Parallax 155
127% 157 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 139
Splatting 118
117% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 119%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
252GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1007 624 590 537 522 515 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
164% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 2,485
Mixed 554
SusWrite 632
235% 1,025 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 49.2
201% 84.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,213
DQ Write 904
DQ Mixed 942
736% 1,020 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 164%
Great: 486%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
112GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1206 392 302 304 302 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 2,014
Write 1,186
Mixed 490
SusWrite 468
229% 1,039 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 58.3
192% 73.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,144
DQ Write 1126
DQ Mixed 722
656% 997 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 219%
Great: 236%
SDHC Card 32GB
27GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 20.6
Write 20
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 20.2
27% 20 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.6
168% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 33%
USB Flash Disk 4GB
3GB free, PID 1d00
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
2.24% Terrible
Read 8.7
Write 1.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 2.2
4% 3.65 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.24%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 46.3
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 40.4
120% 41.9 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 25.4
SC Mixed 28.8
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 111%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 11 9 60 32" 1280 720 BNQ8020 BenQ LCD
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $193

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $933
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback