Medion ERAZER X4701 D/C446

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion ERAZER X4701 D/C446 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION H110H4-EM2
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170105
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '21 at 07:46
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700-$167 256,717 User benchmarks, average bench 76% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 85.9 1-Core 112 2-Core 204 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 440 50% 392 Pts	64-Core 450 28% 450 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Sapphire(174B 6438) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (62 fps cap detected)	49% Average	Lighting 60.2 Reflection 61 Parallax 62.7 49% 61.3 fps	MRender 61.8 Gravity 61.3 Splatting 56.7 49% 59.9 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
240gb SSD 240GB 2,356 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 12GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 8.8 51 82 86 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	39.6% Below average	Read 374 Write 116 Mixed 148 SusWrite 66.7 38% 176 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 38.4 4K Mixed 8.7 61% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 81.6 DQ Write 61 DQ Mixed 12.9 26% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.6% Great: 93%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 114GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 121 122 125 123 122 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	Read 167 Write 159 Mixed 39.3 SusWrite 123 88% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.5 146% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB 24,860 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	63.7% Good	MC Read 24.2 MC Write 23.5 MC Mixed 20.3 65% 22.7 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 21.9 SC Mixed 17.5 51% 17.8 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	60	24"	1280 720	ACI2494 VE248

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER X4701 D/C446 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

System: Medion ERAZER X4701 D/C446

CPU
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	5x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	1x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	1x

SSD
SSD 240GB240gbBench 60%, 2,356 samples	4x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 74%, 24,860 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $286

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16