Asus A55BM-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	27.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus A55BM-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151211
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '21 at 03:56
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD PRO A8-8650B R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6G 953 User benchmarks, average bench 43% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Memory 54.4 1-Core 70.2 2-Core 120 48% 81.6 Pts	4-Core 204 8-Core 197 27% 201 Pts	64-Core 200 12% 200 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 2847) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Lighting 31 Reflection 32.7 Parallax 39.3 25% 34.3 fps	MRender 42 Gravity 40.3 Splatting 33 31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Edge SE847 SSD 240GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: 604ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 153 157 141 164 136 MB/s Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54.1% Above average	Read 139 Write 200 Mixed 197 SusWrite 149 39% 171 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 30.6 106% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 148 DQ Mixed 137 105% 142 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 79%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 596GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 111 111 109 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63.9% Good	Read 113 Write 106 Mixed 64.8 SusWrite 109 72% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 32GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1866 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.9% Below average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 14.1 36% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 10.5 23% 8.03 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	20"	1280 720	HWP305C HP E201

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A55BM-PLUS Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A55BM-PLUS

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	8x
A4-6300 APUAMD $51Bench 40%, 10,924 samples	6x
A8-5600K APUAMD $250Bench 49%, 14,744 samples	5x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	4x
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	3x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
SSD 128GBBench 64%, 3,975 samples	2x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	3x
M378B5673FH0-CH9 M378B5673FH0-CH9 F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL9-4GBXL 12GBSamsungBench 31%, 6 samples	3x
Vengeance DDR3 2000 C10 4x2GBCorsairBench 54%, 81 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $125	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16