Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK GU502LW
Memory	5.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200901
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 24 '21 at 03:08
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10750H 206,796 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 72.9 1-Core 120 2-Core 224 77% 139 Pts	4-Core 335 8-Core 524 53% 430 Pts	64-Core 667 41% 667 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design 8,783 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Asus(1043 174F) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7196 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.1% Above average	Lighting 62 Reflection 51.5 Parallax 39.9 50% 51.1 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 45.9 Splatting 40 49% 64.1 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 90%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1002 1TB 12,046 User benchmarks, average bench 224% 659GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21106000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 722 734 707 439 209 295 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	154% Outstanding	Read 1,215 Write 957 Mixed 1,150 SusWrite 518 215% 960 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 90.4 4K Mixed 51.8 176% 61 MB/s	DQ Read 600 DQ Write 264 DQ Mixed 612 406% 492 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 154% Great: 269%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GB 8,060 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	61.7% Good	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 23.8 MC Mixed 18.4 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 23.9 SC Mixed 20.6 57% 19.8 GB/s	Latency 94.9 42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	7	5	240	15.5"	1280 720	SHP14D3 LQ156M1JW09

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW Builds (Compare 1,195 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus M15 GU502LW_GU502LW

CPU
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	1,117x
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	78x

GPU
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 79%, 8,783 samples	641x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	545x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	6x

SSD
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1002 1TBWDCBench 224%, 12,046 samples	387x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $74Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	318x
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-1T00-1002 1TBNvmeBench 182%, 1,280 samples	136x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CWE M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GBSamsungBench 90%, 3,469 samples	443x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 16GBMicronBench 90%, 8,060 samples	439x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	60x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16