Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics89.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 24 '21 at 01:04
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 136
2-Core 245
91% 159 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 733
74% 598 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.9.1
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.4% Excellent
Lighting 113
Reflection 133
Parallax 169
92% 138 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 120
Splatting 89
85% 105 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,450
Write 2,243
Mixed 1,592
466% 2,095 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 74.3
256% 91.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,228
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 537
474% 733 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Intel 330 Series 120GB-$188
57GB free
Firmware: 300i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 151 152 149 149 146 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 458
Write 132
Mixed 170
SusWrite 147
50% 227 MB/s
4K Read 35.8
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 41.6
166% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 132
104% 147 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 80%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
205GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 144 133 141 137 144 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 145
Write 140
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 140
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
MC Read 34.5
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 27.5
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 35.1
SC Mixed 26.8
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 50.7
79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 58: 6R 9G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
58% 47% 34 326 260 165 31.5" 2560 1440 AOCB305 Q32G3WG3R3
History: Score 38: 2R 6G 10B | Score 58: 6R 9G 1B
Typical MAXIMUS IX FORMULA Builds (Compare 1,523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX FORMULA - $378

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,187
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback