PC Intel Z370

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	72.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	PC Intel Z370 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190805
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '21 at 22:40
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400-$161 22,187 User benchmarks, average bench 86% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Memory 95.1 1-Core 128 2-Core 253 89% 158 Pts	4-Core 506 8-Core 696 76% 601 Pts	64-Core 698 43% 698 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Zotac(19DA 5527) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.3% Very good	Lighting 90.5 Reflection 87.2 Parallax 83.2 74% 87 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 78.9 Splatting 70.6 70% 87.5 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 340GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1029 811 815 822 819 826 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	290% Outstanding	Read 2533 Write 2,296 Mixed 1,750 SusWrite 854 415% 1,858 MB/s	4K Read 59 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 75.7 252% 86 MB/s	DQ Read 1,514 DQ Write 1,097 DQ Mixed 1161 907% 1,257 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 290% Great: 355%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 167GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 116 116 115 117 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Read 136 Write 139 Mixed 77.1 SusWrite 116 86% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GD3000C15K4 2x8GB 5,197 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3001 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	96.5% Outstanding	MC Read 38.1 MC Write 37.2 MC Mixed 27.9 98% 34.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 37.8 SC Mixed 28.1 82% 28.9 GB/s	Latency 56.7 70% 56.7 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 96.5% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	24.5"	1280 720	IVM6132 PL2530H

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Intel Z370 Builds (Compare 1,208 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 91%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

System: PC Intel Z370

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	300x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	221x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	192x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	118x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	105x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	92x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	74x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	54x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	32x

RAM
CM4X8GD3200C16K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 89%, 9,947 samples	74x
CM4X8GF2400Z16K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 73%, 4,992 samples	74x
CM4X8GD3000C15K4 2x8GBCorsairBench 83%, 5,197 samples	71x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $671

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16