| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-D (all builds) |
| Memory | 17.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色 |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20171212 |
| Uptime | 2.9 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 23 '21 at 22:12 |
| Run Duration | 228 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 56% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.7%
Good
|
68% 122 Pts
|
37% 292 Pts
|
21% 346 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
26.7%
Poor
|
28% 35.4 fps
|
25% 31.7 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
62% 281 MB/s
|
78% 30.6 MB/s
|
127% 219 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
569GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 136 138 137 137 139 MB/s
|
91.9%
Outstanding
|
106% 145 MB/s
|
152% 1.07 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
387GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 168 169 168 166 162 MB/s
|
87.9%
Excellent
|
95% 129 MB/s
|
137% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
51.4%
Above average
|
52% 18.2 GB/s
|
41% 14.5 GB/s
|
47% 84.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 6: 1R 0G 1B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6% | 33% | 6 | 11 | 9 | 60 | 12.6" | 1536 864 | AGO0001 |
History: Score 14: 1R 2G 3B | Score 6: 1R 0G 1B
Typical H110M-D Builds (Compare 1,975 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-D
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 414x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 238x |
| Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 220x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 283x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 218x |
| HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 193x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |