Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '21 at 20:51
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 124
60% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 388
36% 302 Pts
64-Core 376
23% 376 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
21.1% Poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 27
Parallax 33.4
19% 28.1 fps
MRender 34.4
Gravity 31
Splatting 25.8
24% 30.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 90 84 78 73 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 420
Write 393
Mixed 326
SusWrite 106
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 42
138% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 179
154% 226 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 118%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
92GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 93 90 92 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
75% Very good
Read 170
Write 135
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 91.9
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 75%
Great: 112%
Maxtor STM3320820AS 320GB
34GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 53 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 53.5
Write 24
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 52.8
31% 42 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 44%
WD Blue 500GB (2007)-$80
58GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 61 60 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 63.9
Write 59.2
Mixed 44
SusWrite 59.6
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 51%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB
70GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 112 111 112 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 111
Write 112
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 112
133% 99 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
28.9% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.3
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 8
24% 8.4 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 32 69 56 60 28.9" 1920 1080 PHL0000 PHILIPS FTV
Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback