Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	69.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2125 1,514 User benchmarks, average bench 78% CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Memory 71.7 1-Core 141 2-Core 282 88% 165 Pts	4-Core 524 8-Core 744 80% 634 Pts	64-Core 733 45% 733 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000 12,628 User benchmarks, average bench 67% Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.56 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Lighting 81.8 Reflection 93.5 Parallax 85.2 67% 86.8 fps	MRender 87.5 Gravity 86.5 Splatting 96 74% 90 fps
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 70%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 21,542 User benchmarks, average bench 238% 354GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7L6QCXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1156 1504 1541 1478 1466 1483 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	263% Outstanding	Read 1,726 Write 1,501 Mixed 552 SusWrite 1,438 292% 1,304 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 50.3 187% 71.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1194 DQ Write 990 DQ Mixed 998 773% 1,061 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 263% Great: 306%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$38 78,255 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 466GB free Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 602 819 853 824 834 840 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	200% Outstanding	Read 1347 Write 905 Mixed 875 SusWrite 795 219% 981 MB/s	4K Read 46.4 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 59.8 232% 89.3 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 850 DQ Mixed 224 278% 474 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 242%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125 12,743 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 3TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 183 181 181 186 176 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 160 Mixed 56.3 SusWrite 180 105% 144 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 417% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A2K43BB1-CTD 2x16GB 295 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	61% Good	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 30.5 MC Mixed 18.5 65% 22.7 GB/s	SC Read 9 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 11.2 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 97.6 41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 69%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	60	42.5"	1280 720	DEL41D4 DELL U4320Q

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 56%

Gunboat

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 50%

Yacht

CPU
Xeon W-2125IntelBench 78%, 1,514 samples	2x

GPU
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	2x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	2x

RAM
M393A2K43BB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 295 samples	1x
M393A2K43BB1-CTD 4x16GBSamsungBench 90%, 273 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16