MSI H61M-P22 (G3) (MS-7788)

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	MSI MS-7788
Motherboard	MSI H61M-P22 (G3) (MS-7788) (all builds)
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131018
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '21 at 17:54
Run Duration	287 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	74.5% Very good	Memory 92.3 1-Core 94.3 2-Core 188 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 340 44% 334 Pts	64-Core 327 20% 327 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 74.5% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	35.9% Below average	Lighting 41.7 Reflection 62.5 Parallax 55 34% 53.1 fps	MRender 55.4 Gravity 51.5 Splatting 41.3 40% 49.4 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 35.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingdian S200 60GB 737 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: P0921B SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 73 72 80 71 73 MB/s Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39.8% Below average	Read 254 Write 77.5 Mixed 101 SusWrite 74.6 28% 127 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 63.1 4K Mixed 9.5 75% 30.8 MB/s	DQ Read 78.4 DQ Write 78.7 DQ Mixed 51.8 46% 69.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 69%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 8GB free Firmware: 14.03G14 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.9 1.5 1.5 2.3 2.3 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	1.72% Terrible	Read 4.2 Write 0.2 Mixed 3 SusWrite 1.8 2% 2.3 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 1.72% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 1x4GB 7,599 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	31.2% Below average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 10.1 MC Mixed 8.6 28% 9.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 10.9 SC Mixed 8.4 28% 9.8 GB/s	Latency 63.6 63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 22: 3R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
22%	16%	38	102	1	60	23.8"	1920 1080	PHLC155 PHL 243V7

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-P22 (G3) (MS-7788) Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H61M-P22 (G3) (MS-7788)

CPU
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	7x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	6x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	5x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	10x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
S200 60GBKingdianBench 47%, 737 samples	2x
Burst 240GBPatriotBench 73%, 26,886 samples	2x

RAM
M378B5173QH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,599 samples	4x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	3x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16