HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84DB
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200323
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateSep 23 '21 at 17:17
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 61.1
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 172
59% 106 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 442
45% 367 Pts
64-Core 614
38% 614 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
HP(103C 84DB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.38
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
49.6% Average
Lighting 59.4
Reflection 70.3
Parallax 61.2
48% 63.6 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 61.6
Splatting 62.9
52% 63.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,132
Write 611
Mixed 450
160% 731 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 47.3
4K Mixed 42.4
112% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 699
DQ Write 217
DQ Mixed 166
199% 361 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 317%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
694GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 98 84 98 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 110
Write 112
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 96.5
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 75%
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
645GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 106 106 105 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 121
Write 106
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 105
131% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.6
167% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
39% Below average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.2
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 39%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 6 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15FE
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx Builds (Compare 3,698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback