Samsung 870Z5G/880Z5F

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Samsung 870Z5G/880Z5F (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP870Z5G-X01IT
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150521
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '21 at 15:12
Run Duration	165 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370 42,062 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 78.2 1-Core 91.3 2-Core 174 66% 114 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 335 41% 314 Pts	64-Core 361 22% 361 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C740) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	2.32% Terrible	Lighting 2.7 Reflection 7.9 Parallax 5.3 2% 5.3 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 2 Splatting 4.1 3% 3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.32% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 342GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 277 202 163 191 198 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	Read 452 Write 433 Mixed 384 SusWrite 225 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 58.4 4K Mixed 39.3 127% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 279 DQ Mixed 334 247% 327 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 133%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 1,913 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.2 7.8 7.8 7 7.9 7.8 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	6.07% Terrible	Read 21.8 Write 7.7 Mixed 6 SusWrite 7.6 12% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 20% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.07% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GB 40,451 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.8% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 6.5 21% 7.47 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 4.9 15% 5.17 GB/s	Latency 84 48% 84 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 18: 3R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
18%	12%	52	60	4	60	15.5"	1536 864	SDC324C

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 870Z5G/880Z5F Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 870Z5G/880Z5F

CPU
Core i7-4700HQIntel $370Bench 62%, 42,062 samples	21x
Core i7-4710HQIntelBench 58%, 69,536 samples	10x
Core i5-4200HIntelBench 57%, 11,882 samples	4x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	23x
GeForce GT 750MNvidiaBench 8%, 13,088 samples	13x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x
MZ7TE256HMHP-00004 256GBSamsungBench 75%, 878 samples	2x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x

RAM
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	22x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1119 S939A2SGS-ITR 16GBSamsungBench 50%, 8 samples	2x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GBSamsungBench 50%, 586 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $470

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16