| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 48.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Notebook W65_67SJ (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Notebook W65_67SJ |
| Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140825 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 23 '21 at 13:39 |
| Run Duration | 134 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 64% |
PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.1%
Good
|
63% 103 Pts
|
32% 239 Pts
|
15% 239 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 850M
Clevo(1558 6501) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7212
|
14.1%
Very poor
|
14% 16.4 fps
|
14% 16.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 73 78 82 79 84 MB/s
|
48.1%
Average
|
21% 95.1 MB/s
|
104% 37.7 MB/s
|
42% 81.7 MB/s
|
|
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
56GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 6.6 7.2 8.1 7.6 7.6 MB/s
|
13%
Very poor
|
30% 29.4 MB/s
|
18% 1.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
56.7%
Above average
|
58% 20.1 GB/s
|
42% 14.6 GB/s
|
58% 68.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical W65_67SJ Builds (Compare 100 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Notebook W65_67SJ
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4710MQIntel $50Bench 60%, 15,557 samples | 32x |
| Core i7-4810MQIntel $400Bench 62%, 26,927 samples | 23x |
| Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples | 14x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples | 54x |
| GTX 850MNvidiaBench 14%, 13,931 samples | 45x |
| HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $88 |