Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 R2

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	16.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 R2 (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171108
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '21 at 13:16
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 840-$150 5,147 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Memory 49.2 1-Core 43.8 2-Core 91.9 37% 61.6 Pts	4-Core 114 8-Core 147 17% 131 Pts	64-Core 145 9% 145 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 55%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3732) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.7% Poor	Lighting 33.3 Reflection 45 Parallax 36.1 27% 38.1 fps	MRender 37.1 Gravity 35.9 Splatting 24.4 26% 32.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF5000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 75 65 59 5.3 54 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16.9% Very poor	Read 139 Write 117 Mixed 94.9 SusWrite 52 22% 101 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 10.1 4K Mixed 6.7 24% 7.83 MB/s	DQ Read 17.4 DQ Write 14.4 DQ Mixed 18.1 13% 16.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 56%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 542GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 75 64 59 5.7 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 113 Write 50.5 Mixed 56.1 SusWrite 52.1 50% 68 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 14GB 9,406 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 6.2 20% 6.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	15	107	5	60	22"	1680 1050	PHL0868 Philips 220SW

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 R2 Builds (Compare 915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 R2

CPU
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	372x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	273x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	76x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	132x
Radeon RX 560-BAMDBench 20%, 49,289 samples	56x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	43x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	31x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	16x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	281x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	117x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	87x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $134

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16