Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive90.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190506
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 23 '21 at 13:02
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 127
2-Core 247
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 927
84% 709 Pts
64-Core 1,243
77% 1,243 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 115
Parallax 104
86% 108 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 106
Splatting 102
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 348 407 402 400 430 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 435
Mixed 421
SusWrite 397
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 38.6
120% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 96.4
DQ Mixed 145
117% 169 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 123%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
422GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 356 425 417 414 442 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 452
Mixed 431
SusWrite 411
102% 451 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 40.6
138% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 61.8
DQ Mixed 106
96% 152 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
655GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 356 425 417 413 442 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
97.2% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 440
Mixed 432
SusWrite 411
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 36.3
4K Mixed 39.4
136% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 58.1
DQ Mixed 95.9
102% 180 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 97.2%
Great: 133%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
439GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 187 182 179 176 193 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 122
Write 159
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 184
89% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 2
359% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 88%
Great: 111%
Hitachi HTS722020K9SA00 200GB-$35
131GB free
Firmware: DC4AC77A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 58 55 55 54 58 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 55
Mixed 32
SusWrite 55.6
36% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 37%
WD My Passport Essential 500GB
155GB free, PID 070a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 30 30 29 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 27.5
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 30
38% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 18%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
387GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 74 72 72 69 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 136
Write 123
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 73.1
109% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 53%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
32GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 22 22 25 22 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
23.4% Poor
Read 113
Write 41.2
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 21.1
55% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
38% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK32GX4M2B3200C16 CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 37.6
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 29.4
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 34.4
102% 35.6 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 111%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 5R 4G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
37% 35% 26 111 8 60 72.3" 2731 1440 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback