Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA506II
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210312
Uptime	3.5 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '21 at 12:06
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H 27,218 User benchmarks, average bench 70% FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Memory 59.8 1-Core 50.2 2-Core 121 45% 77.1 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 484 48% 394 Pts	64-Core 598 37% 598 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU) 162,082 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Asus(1043 16DF) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32.06 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	4.71% Terrible	Lighting 4.9 Reflection 30 Parallax 8.4 4% 14.4 fps	MRender 7.7 Gravity 6.7 Splatting 7.8 6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 4.71% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GB 4,206 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 196GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20200000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 387 397 398 399 401 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Read 1,062 Write 926 Mixed 858 SusWrite 405 182% 813 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 95.1 4K Mixed 42.8 138% 53.2 MB/s	DQ Read 634 DQ Write 418 DQ Mixed 538 398% 530 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 189%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 125 126 126 125 126 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 116 Write 99 Mixed 65.4 SusWrite 124 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905700-053.A00G Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 16GB 151 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	81.9% Excellent	MC Read 29.5 MC Write 34.5 MC Mixed 30.9 90% 31.6 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 19.5 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	15.5"	1280 720	NCP002D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II Builds (Compare 445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506II_FA506II

CPU
Ryzen 5 4600HAMDBench 70%, 27,218 samples	223x
Ryzen 7 4800HAMDBench 74%, 20,504 samples	222x

GPU
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples	275x
GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 42%, 33,798 samples	170x

SSD
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GBBench 176%, 33,645 samples	85x
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	78x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1002 512GBWDCBench 188%, 12,375 samples	65x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	90x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 1x8GBMicronBench 44%, 28,935 samples	62x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16