Asus WS C422 SAGE/10G

Performance Results


Gaming 103% UFO	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 89% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus WS C422 SAGE/10G (all builds)
Memory	27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191018
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '21 at 09:27
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W-2125 1,514 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 76.6 1-Core 133 2-Core 250 84% 153 Pts	4-Core 438 8-Core 651 68% 544 Pts	64-Core 666 41% 666 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 1,749 User benchmarks, average bench 131% Nvidia(10DE 129F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	129% Outstanding	Lighting 172 Reflection 172 Parallax 176 140% 174 fps	MRender 182 Gravity 154 Splatting 142 128% 159 fps
Poor: 122% ↑ This bench: 129% Great: 137%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
7thSense-240GB 253GB 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: B SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 224 222 222 217 220 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	78.8% Very good	Read 400 Write 219 Mixed 223 SusWrite 219 59% 265 MB/s	4K Read 19.9 4K Write 90.2 4K Mixed 34.3 122% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 243 DQ Mixed 182 158% 236 MB/s

Nvme HUSMR7619BHP3Y1 2TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 178% 944GB free Firmware: D110 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 701 788 766 778 756 768 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	177% Outstanding	Read 538 Write 754 Mixed 590 SusWrite 759 150% 661 MB/s	4K Read 42.2 4K Write 90.9 4K Mixed 54.2 182% 62.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1275 DQ Write 1,091 DQ Mixed 1,214 901% 1,193 MB/s
Poor: 177% ↑ This bench: 177% Great: 179%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1K43BB1-CTD 4x8GB 410 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79% Very good	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 49 MC Mixed 22.9 88% 30.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.3 SC Write 21.8 SC Mixed 10.2 37% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 87.1 46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	6	120	103.4"	1280 720	STH0007 7th_WUXGA

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical WS C422 SAGE/10G Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 162%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 164%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS C422 SAGE/10G

CPU
Xeon W-2245IntelBench 88%, 471 samples	6x
Xeon W-2223IntelBench 72%, 443 samples	4x
Xeon W-2123IntelBench 70%, 2,702 samples	3x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	3x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	3x
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples	2x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $150Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	4x
860 Pro 1TBSamsung $300Bench 112%, 8,179 samples	4x
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $320Bench 327%, 38,669 samples	2x

RAM
M393A4K40CB2-CTD 4x31.8GBSamsungBench 77%, 188 samples	3x
M393A2K43CB2-CVF 4x16GBSamsungBench 93%, 29 samples	3x
Dominator DDR4 2666 C15 8x16GBCorsairBench 112%, 126 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $1,060

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16