Asrock B95M-DGS

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock B95M-DGS (all builds)
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150408
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '21 at 08:57
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Memory 90.4 1-Core 101 2-Core 195 75% 129 Pts	4-Core 344 8-Core 323 45% 334 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3783) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	29.3% Poor	Lighting 37 Reflection 41.4 Parallax 38.6 30% 39 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 39 Splatting 27.6 28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 29.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Teelkoou 128GB 128GB 55 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 46 24 38 21 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	39.9% Below average	Read 411 Write 136 Mixed 204 SusWrite 43.7 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 0.5 71% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 18.2 DQ Write 59.1 DQ Mixed 20.9 21% 32.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 81%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 458GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 166 186 186 191 193 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 179 Write 183 Mixed 74 SusWrite 182 112% 154 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR3 1600 1x8GB 1,440 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 11.5 MC Mixed 9.2 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 10.2 SC Mixed 9.7 27% 9.53 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	5	75	23.8"	1280 720	IPS2400 R240

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B95M-DGS Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock B95M-DGS

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	10x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	6x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	4x

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	4x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	4x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	3x

SSD
SU650 240GBAdata $70Bench 70%, 47,016 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
MZ7LN128HAHQ-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 87%, 714 samples	2x

RAM
99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 9,823 samples	2x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	2x
DDR3 1600 1x8GBUnknownBench 29%, 1,440 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $205

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16