Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QE_FA506QE

Performance Results


Gaming 63% Destroyer	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 58% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	70.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QE_FA506QE (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA506QE
Memory	7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210602
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 23 '21 at 06:36
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600H 23,730 User benchmarks, average bench 73% FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Memory 76.8 1-Core 142 2-Core 286 90% 168 Pts	4-Core 511 8-Core 765 79% 638 Pts	64-Core 996 62% 996 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop) 35,839 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Asus(1043 123C) ≥ 4GB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.40.44.02 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	70.1% Very good	Lighting 93.6 Reflection 87.2 Parallax 91.7 76% 90.8 fps	MRender 76.9 Gravity 70.8 Splatting 67.4 58% 71.7 fps
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.1% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB 9,047 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 116GB free (System drive) Firmware: 41000C20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 758 689 668 586 520 499 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	215% Outstanding	Read 1,922 Write 1,613 Mixed 1409 SusWrite 620 311% 1,391 MB/s	4K Read 52.9 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 68.2 224% 76.2 MB/s	DQ Read 916 DQ Write 447 DQ Mixed 1,023 669% 795 MB/s
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 215% Great: 313%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,970 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 670GB free, PID 0212 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 105 103 104 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 95.9 Write 104 Mixed 36.5 SusWrite 104 114% 85.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB 57,752 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	61.1% Good	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 24.9 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 22.6 SC Write 19.1 SC Mixed 25.9 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 86.7 46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 44: 5R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
44%	33%	49	320	257	144	15.5"	1536 864	CMN1521

History: Score 49: 5R 6G 6B | Score 44: 5R 4G 7B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QE_FA506QE Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A15 FA506QE_FA506QE

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600HAMDBench 73%, 23,730 samples	66x
Ryzen 7 5800HAMDBench 75%, 19,785 samples	3x

GPU
RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)AMDBench 17%, 140,621 samples	46x
RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)NvidiaBench 61%, 35,839 samples	23x

SSD
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBBench 217%, 9,047 samples	58x
MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBSamsungBench 166%, 12,842 samples	5x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	2x

RAM
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	43x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GBMicronBench 71%, 19,121 samples	19x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16