PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Colorful C.H81A-BTC (all builds) |
Memory | 8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170815 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Sep 23 '21 at 05:55 |
Run Duration | 201 Seconds |
Run User | LKA-User |
Background CPU | 51% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
73.5%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.1%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN08108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 226 96 98 96 99 90 MB/s
|
72.4%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
82GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 124 127 127 128 127 MB/s
|
70.6%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46
8GB free
Firmware: VM100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 34 34 34 33 35 MB/s
|
18.4%
Very poor
|
|||
22GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 7.8 9 6.3 7.5 9.1 MB/s
|
2.75%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
|
46.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 12 | 10 | 60 | 21.9" | 1280 720 | SAM09C7 S22C450 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples | 26x |
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 23x |
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 14x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 8x |
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 7x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 75% - Very good | Total price: $318 |