Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics79% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190125
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateSep 23 '21 at 05:13
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 74.3
1-Core 98
2-Core 196
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 711
66% 553 Pts
64-Core 1,054
65% 1,054 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
PNY(196E 11A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79% Very good
Lighting 97.6
Reflection 107
Parallax 97.8
80% 101 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 96.1
Splatting 95.1
78% 95.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 474
Write 168
Mixed 177
59% 273 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 26
102% 32.5 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 66.1
DQ Mixed 126
118% 193 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
67GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 648 414 428 429 411 430 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,436
Write 1003
Mixed 998
SusWrite 460
217% 974 MB/s
4K Read 52.9
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 40
152% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 742
DQ Write 55.2
DQ Mixed 94
145% 297 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 149%
Great: 302%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
590GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 198 205 201 193 210 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 126
Write 93.5
Mixed 72.7
SusWrite 198
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
79GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 103 146 143 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.8% Good
Read 99.3
Write 98.2
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 116
69% 93.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBF2X04JEEE36-12-K 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.1
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 28.2
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 26.4
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 91.7
44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 54: 6R 6G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
54% 19% 96 318 248 60 27" 1920 1080 ACR0300 G276HL
History: Score 43: 5R 4G 6B | Score 54: 6R 6G 6B
Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback