PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 18.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME H410M-A (all builds) |
Memory | 3.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200612 |
Uptime | 0.7 Days |
Run Date | Sep 23 '21 at 01:52 |
Run Duration | 118 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 50% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
|
71.4%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.12
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
18.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
494GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 94 116 123 114 108 MB/s
|
53.4%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CL19-19-19 D4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
|
66.5%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-10400FIntel $99Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 598x |
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 338x |
Core i5-10400Intel $130Bench 84%, 71,804 samples | 268x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 146x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 131x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 123x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $282 |