Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z10PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z10PE-D8 WS
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1680x1050x4294967296 szín, 3840x2160x4294967296 szín, 3840x2160x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 21:26
Run Duration273 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 180
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 718
63% 534 Pts
64-Core 3,305
205% 3,305 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 295X2 (CrossFire Disabled)
AMD(1002 0B2A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1018 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.2% Average
Lighting 61.4
Reflection 70.9
Parallax 87.5
50% 73.3 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 61.7
Splatting 43.8
45% 56.1 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 55%
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Asus(1043 85EC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
124% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 187
Parallax 179
136% 178 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 177
Splatting 127
118% 146 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 124%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 241 229 224 222 216 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 437
Write 418
Mixed 323
SusWrite 230
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 35.4
139% 50.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 231
201% 299 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
43GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 210 175 170 168 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 438
Write 415
Mixed 393
SusWrite 205
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 44.7
162% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 348
262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 129%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 117 121 120 120 121 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 101
Write 103
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 118
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 83%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
848GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 100 101 101 100 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 69.8
Mixed 93.1
SusWrite 99.3
68% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 84%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
610GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 130 133 132 132 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 116
Write 73.1
Mixed 102
SusWrite 130
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 83%
WD WD30EURX 3TB-$144
904GB free
Firmware: 0A80
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 76.5
Mixed 43.9
46% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 1 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 83%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
30GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 175 171 177 176 176 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 50% Great: 108%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
197GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 80 79 79 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 78.8
Write 73.5
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 79.2
52% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A5143DB0-CPB 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.9% Above average
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 19.3
63% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 16.8
40% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 7 5 60 21.5" 1280 720 SAM0373 SyncMaster
Typical Z10PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

System: Asus Z10PE-D8 WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $643
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback