Asus PRIME B360M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B360M-C  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190322
Uptime18.3 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 18:44
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8600-$165
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 80.3
1-Core 131
2-Core 255
85% 155 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 509
62% 478 Pts
64-Core 573
36% 573 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 1E84) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 138
Reflection 129
Parallax 136
112% 134 fps
MRender 165
Gravity 114
Splatting 99.1
100% 126 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 106%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG Gammix S11 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 154 202 244 263 236 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 1,108
Write 255
Mixed 363
SusWrite 214
106% 485 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 36
135% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 258
198% 271 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 111%
Great: 258%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
70GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 131 125 141 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 197
Mixed 100
SusWrite 135
116% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.8
354% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 138%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60
1GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 45.7
Write 19.5
Mixed 32
24% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 60%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
1GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 60.5
Write 61
Mixed 52
43% 57.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
22GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 88 87 86 92 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 118
Write 105
Mixed 89
SusWrite 89.4
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.M8FH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
62% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 19.5
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 14.3
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 79.9
50% 79.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 60: 6R 7G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
60% 29% 76 266 140 144 27" 2560 1440 SAM0F57 C27JG5x
History: Score 31: 3R 3G 7B | Score 24: 0R 8G 0B | Score 60: 6R 7G 9B
Typical PRIME B360M-C Builds (Compare 589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B360M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $320
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback