Medion ERAZER i72000/C103

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	61.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Medion ERAZER i72000/C103 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION B150H4-EM
Memory	3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151124
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '21 at 17:16
Run Duration	243 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	46%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 77.9 1-Core 95.2 2-Core 181 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 446 48% 380 Pts	64-Core 471 29% 471 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560 214,030 User benchmarks, average bench 79% Nvidia(10DE 1151) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	61.9% Good	Lighting 77.7 Reflection 87.5 Parallax 77.9 63% 81 fps	MRender 76 Gravity 75.1 Splatting 67.7 59% 72.9 fps
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 61.9% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GB 3,145 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT2100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 62 49 49 49 53 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 303 Write 99.6 Mixed 96.8 SusWrite 57 30% 139 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 49.7 4K Mixed 19 79% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 31.6 DQ Write 85.8 DQ Mixed 30.9 32% 49.4 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 178 176 176 175 175 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	80.7% Excellent	Read 106 Write 81.8 Mixed 66 SusWrite 175 79% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB 8,407 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	MC Read 20.9 MC Write 23 MC Mixed 19.7 61% 21.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 16.4 44% 15.5 GB/s	Latency 84.4 47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 63: 8R 7G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
63%	59%	29	266	207	144	27"	1920 1080	MSI3FA6 MSI MAG271C

History: Score 47: 5R 5G 7B | Score 54: 6R 7G 3B | Score 63: 8R 7G 2B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ERAZER i72000/C103 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 51%

Yacht

System: Medion ERAZER i72000/C103

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples	1x

SSD
MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 3,145 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 8,407 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $740

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16