Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus VivoBook 15_ASUS Laptop X540BA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X540BA
Memory	2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200402
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '21 at 09:22
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G 2,804 User benchmarks, average bench 29% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	27% Poor	Memory 42.4 1-Core 40.4 2-Core 70.7 31% 51.2 Pts	4-Core 68.8 8-Core 72.7 9% 70.8 Pts	64-Core 87.1 5% 87.1 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics 13,349 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 1291) 80MB Ram: 80MB, Driver: 20.10.44.13 Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	0.9% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 1.4 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.23 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 0.9% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS128G32TND-N210A 128GB 4,377 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30200P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 107 100 122 123 118 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 394 Write 124 Mixed 146 SusWrite 115 43% 195 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 33.4 4K Mixed 15.8 67% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 111 93% 136 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 75%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 931GB free Firmware: JU0C0J SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 111 121 135 134 130 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	74% Very good	Read 130 Write 119 Mixed 57 SusWrite 127 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 147% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 79%
JetFlash Transcend 32GB 1,079 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 27GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 14 17 18 16 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	7.75% Terrible	Read 21.2 Write 13.3 Mixed 8 SusWrite 15.8 18% 14.6 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.75% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB 40,829 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.1% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 8.2 24% 8.27 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 7.5 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 192 21% 192 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	15.5"	1280 720	BOE069C

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 27%, 15,014 samples	54x
A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3GAMDBench 29%, 2,804 samples	25x
A4-9125 RADEON R3, 4 COMPUTE CORES 2C+2GAMDBench 29%, 2,523 samples	14x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	54x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	25x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,360 samples	14x

SSD
Micron_1300_MTFDDAK256TDL 256GBBench 69%, 220 samples	13x
RBUSC180DS37128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 55%, 109 samples	6x
SD9SB8W256G1102 256GBSandiskBench 66%, 69 samples	5x

RAM
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	28x
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 32,443 samples	24x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	9x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16