Fujitsu ESPRIMO P700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P700  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3061-A1
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120124
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 08:50
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 81
2-Core 170
60% 106 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 305
44% 325 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
MSI(1462 8A90) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1203 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 28
Parallax 21.7
13% 21.8 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 21.3
18% 21.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,405
Write 32.1
Mixed 49.3
241% 1,162 MB/s
4K Read 354
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 4.6
543% 120 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 99%
WD Blue 250GB (2007)-$20
55GB free
Firmware: 12.01B02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,354
Write 5.7
Mixed 7
564% 789 MB/s
4K Read 330
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.7
13,850% 110 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 55%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18
92GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 557
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.7
136% 189 MB/s
4K Read 331
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
13,891% 111 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 47%
Hitachi HTS545032B9A300 320GB-$59
6GB free
Firmware: PB3ZC61H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 67 68 69 68 67 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 74.5
Write 64.5
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 67
44% 60.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.7% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 6.4
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 5 60 23.8" 1280 720 AOC2401 24B1W1
Typical ESPRIMO P700 Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback