Lenovo 80T6

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Lenovo 80T6 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 00RD15IPG075
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160808
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 22 '21 at 07:01
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	42%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3160 1,747 User benchmarks, average bench 28% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Memory 38.2 1-Core 15 2-Core 30.3 20% 27.8 Pts	4-Core 46.1 8-Core 45.7 6% 45.9 Pts	64-Core 52.8 3% 52.8 Pts
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3809) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.56% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.6 Parallax 2.7 1% 1.97 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.8 2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.56% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
BR 960G 960GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 863GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0423B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 354 345 349 351 335 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 358 Write 323 Mixed 291 SusWrite 346 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 26.7 4K Mixed 14.6 52% 18.1 MB/s	DQ Read 83.8 DQ Write 102 DQ Mixed 39 44% 75 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 77%
Sandisk Extreme SSD 1TB 4,980 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 61GB free Firmware: 1012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	10.2% Very poor	Read 34.1 Write 33.3 Mixed 36.1 SusWrite 39.7 8% 35.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 3.8 4K Mixed 6.5 20% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 10.2% Great: 87%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 4.7 6.2 6.8 6.7 6.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	3.18% Terrible	Read 9 Write 0.8 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 6 5% 4.62 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.18% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5674EB0-YK0 2x2GB 1,365 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	20.9% Poor	MC Read 6.8 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.1 22% 7.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.47 GB/s	Latency 211 19% 211 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 20.9% Great: 25%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 80T6 Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 22%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80T6

CPU
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	96x
Celeron N3160IntelBench 28%, 1,747 samples	15x
Pentium N3710IntelBench 25%, 12,685 samples	10x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	121x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
X25-M 80GBIntelBench 34%, 12,660 samples	1x

RAM
4KTF25664HZ-1G9P1 2x2GBMicronBench 17%, 1,473 samples	62x
M471B5674EB0-YK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 18%, 1,365 samples	35x
HMT425S6CFR6A-PB 2x2GBHynixBench 29%, 640 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16