Asus Z97-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97-P  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160311
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 03:51
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
CPU Throttled 99%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5775C-$183
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 95.8
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 239
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 688
69% 563 Pts
64-Core 678
42% 678 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
161% Outstanding
Lighting 216
Reflection 205
Parallax 233
176% 218 fps
MRender 266
Gravity 217
Splatting 173
174% 218 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 161%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 254 247 246 246 243 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 700
Write 603
Mixed 447
SusWrite 288
114% 509 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 47.9
173% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 678
DQ Write 540
DQ Mixed 573
439% 597 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 126%
Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190
312GB free
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 392 403 406 415 412 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 470
Mixed 383
SusWrite 389
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 46.4
157% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
42GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 393 304 227 219 206 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 456
Write 448
Mixed 386
SusWrite 275
291% 391 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 87.3
4K Mixed 54.2
9,268% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 362
3,321% 362 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
557GB free
Firmware: 05.03D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 120 120 119 121 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 82.5
Write 85
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 119
68% 91.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
MC Read 42.4
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 36.3
106% 37 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 24.1
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 54.5
73% 54.5 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 48.5" 1280 720 ONK0B62 TX-NR609
Typical Z97-P Builds (Compare 2,951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-P - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $758
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback