Asrock X99M Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X99M Killer  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateSep 22 '21 at 03:29
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 182
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 722
65% 548 Pts
64-Core 999
62% 999 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.6% Excellent
Lighting 98.8
Reflection 114
Parallax 102
80% 105 fps
MRender 95.4
Gravity 98.6
Splatting 100
81% 98.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung XP941 PCIe M.2 256GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM6501Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 640 662 648 644 636 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 933
Write 713
Mixed 471
SusWrite 614
152% 683 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 37.1
134% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 472
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 238
204% 307 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 131%
Great: 160%
WD Se 3TB (2013)-$67
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 151 151 152 150 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 153
Write 148
Mixed 90.4
SusWrite 148
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 99%
WD WD60PURX-64LZMY0 6TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 168 166 167 170 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
98.6% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 118
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 164
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
150% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 98.6%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 47.2
MC Write 42.3
MC Mixed 41.8
125% 43.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 15.9
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 78.8
51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 110%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 30 32" 1280 720 XXX0000 AAA
Typical X99M Killer Builds (Compare 103 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X99M Killer - $242

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback