HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteBook Folio 9470m (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18DF
Memory	4.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140113
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '21 at 22:24
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	JAM-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3687U 2,933 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Memory 77.6 1-Core 52.7 2-Core 83.9 47% 71.4 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 138 18% 136 Pts	64-Core 131 8% 131 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 18DF) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.76% Terrible	Lighting 3.3 Reflection 1.8 Parallax 2.7 3% 2.6 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4.3 3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.76% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240 GB 240GB 24,911 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF3600RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 3.4 35 32 1.9 23 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 416 Write 186 Mixed 152 SusWrite 18.8 42% 193 MB/s	4K Read 14.2 4K Write 15.7 4K Mixed 15.2 49% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 110 DQ Write 58 DQ Mixed 42.1 42% 69.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5428-063.A00LF Elpida EBJ40UG8EFU0-GN-F 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.6% Average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 13.9 MC Mixed 13.2 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 12.9 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 85 47% 85 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 50: 7R 5G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
50%	23%	52	45	36	40	14"	1366 768	SDC4942

History: Score 28: 0R 9G 1B | Score 50: 7R 5G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook Folio 9470m Builds (Compare 953 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook Folio 9470m

CPU
Core i5-3437UIntelBench 49%, 3,817 samples	339x
Core i5-3427UIntelBench 49%, 4,182 samples	313x
Core i7-3687UIntelBench 53%, 2,933 samples	171x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	952x
Ivy 4PhdgdBench 4%, 153 samples	1x

SSD
SSD Pro 1500 Series 180GBIntel $209Bench 69%, 7,834 samples	65x
520 Series 180GBIntel $132Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	41x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	27x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	28x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	25x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 51,191 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 4% - Terrible

Total price: $209

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16