User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	ECT
Motherboard	Clevo P7xxTM1
Memory	25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171123
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '21 at 22:15
Run Duration	253 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 0.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Memory 57.1 1-Core 35.5 2-Core 58.3 34% 50.3 Pts	4-Core 96.2 8-Core 151 15% 124 Pts	64-Core 179 11% 179 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 94%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
CT2000P1SSD8 2TB 2,070 User benchmarks, average bench 254% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 154 127 151 153 155 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Read 871 Write 771 Mixed 682 SusWrite 169 139% 623 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 26.5 4K Mixed 30.3 83% 25.6 MB/s	DQ Read 259 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 211 156% 209 MB/s
Poor: 169% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 321%
Pc300 NVMe SK hynix 1TB 1,290 User benchmarks, average bench 161% 38GB free Firmware: 20005A00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 35 38 39 39 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16% Very poor	Read 80.5 Write 41.5 Mixed 53 SusWrite 37.8 12% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 4.3 37% 8.97 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 199%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 8GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 53 50 52 58 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	24% Poor	Read 28.3 Write 79.5 Mixed 44.5 SusWrite 55 38% 51.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.1 50% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 70%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2GB free Firmware: SDM1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 49.2 Write 68.8 Mixed 28.5 36% 48.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4 4K Mixed 0.4 152% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 70%
WD Elements SE 2622 5TB 272 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 68GB free, PID 2622 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 112 102 111 115 113 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 126 Write 108 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 111 139% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.8 153% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 67%
WD Elements SE 2622 5TB 272 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 36GB free, PID 2622 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 100 111 112 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 89 Write 108 Mixed 68 SusWrite 109 129% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 6 4K Mixed 0.8 235% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FHD1 8ATF1G64HZ-2G3B1 859B CT8G4SFS824A.C8FHD1 32GB 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	42.3% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 11.8 MC Mixed 17.4 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 11.7 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 136 29% 136 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 21: 0R 7G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
21%	44%	16	32	10	75	0"	1920 1080

History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 21: 0R 7G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16