PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B460M Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200831 |
Uptime | 4.9 Days |
Run Date | Sep 21 '21 at 22:04 |
Run Duration | 203 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 10% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-10600K-$155
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
|
94.2%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$104
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
22.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Transcend TS120GSSD220S 120GB
33GB free
Firmware: SBFR71.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 14 150 8.2 11 78 MB/s
|
66.8%
Good
|
|||
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 88 84 66 83 96 MB/s
|
62.4%
Good
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
371GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 78 76 76 75 76 MB/s
|
42.2%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESCK.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
77.9%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27% | 30% | 44 | 108 | 5 | 165 | 24" | 1920 1080 | AUS24AC VG248 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-10400FIntel $101Bench 85%, 153,026 samples | 965x |
Core i5-10400Intel $132Bench 84%, 71,804 samples | 367x |
Core i3-10100FIntel $69Bench 80%, 39,812 samples | 237x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples | 223x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 170x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 160x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 91% - Outstanding | Total price: $459 |