PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | To Intel X79 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210130 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Sep 21 '21 at 20:56 |
Run Duration | 221 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 15% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
60.8%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3764) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.92
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
662GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 100 91 103 175 178 MB/s
|
89.6%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
91.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25% | 26% | 35 | 300 | 222 | 60 | 23" | 1366 768 | GSM59CA 2D HD LG TV |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples | 505x |
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples | 215x |
Xeon E5-2620 0Intel $77Bench 58%, 3,540 samples | 95x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 140x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 112x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 90x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $158 |