Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 95% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 81% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	99.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560x1440x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 21 '21 at 20:53
Run Duration	340 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$155 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Memory 88.4 1-Core 137 2-Core 256 90% 160 Pts	4-Core 529 8-Core 691 78% 610 Pts	64-Core 734 45% 734 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$274 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Asus(1043 87F5) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	99.1% Outstanding	Lighting 129 Reflection 147 Parallax 122 105% 133 fps	MRender 140 Gravity 101 Splatting 88.3 88% 110 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 7,214 User benchmarks, average bench 184% 128GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73D1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,562 Write 1,309 Mixed 874 277% 1,248 MB/s	4K Read 56.1 4K Write 144 4K Mixed 77.3 260% 92.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,455 DQ Write 1,105 DQ Mixed 1079 861% 1,213 MB/s
Poor: 107% Great: 243%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 47GB free Firmware: 583ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 85 97 96 99 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 272 Write 122 Mixed 173 SusWrite 93.4 36% 165 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 78.1 4K Mixed 33.3 126% 46.4 MB/s	DQ Read 94.1 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 104 79% 106 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 73%
Samsung MZ7LM480HCHP-0E003 480GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 163GB free Firmware: GXT3003Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 419 422 424 421 421 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 472 Write 437 Mixed 309 SusWrite 417 92% 409 MB/s	4K Read 30.1 4K Write 85.3 4K Mixed 40.1 142% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 284 231% 328 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 113%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB 19,163 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 3TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 174 174 175 172 174 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	34.6% Below average	Read 191 Write 168 Mixed 107 SusWrite 174 36% 160 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 11.5 4K Mixed 1 60% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1.1 DQ Write 12.3 DQ Mixed 1.1 2% 4.83 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 39%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 34GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 12GB free Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 1,062 Write 1,010 Mixed 984 228% 1,019 MB/s	4K Read 47.2 4K Write 165 4K Mixed 70.5 249% 94.3 MB/s	DQ Read 659 DQ Write 924 DQ Mixed 781 593% 788 MB/s
Poor: 92% Great: 105%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 251GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 68GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 736 249 251 243 242 254 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 67% Great: 112%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 166 174 174 171 174 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Read 114 Write 104 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 171 80% 110 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 108%
Medianca External USB 3.0 1TB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 250GB free Firmware: 1201 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 96 98 98 99 98 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 89.3 Write 95.6 Mixed 34.2 SusWrite 97.1 58% 79 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 57%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 859GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 113 112 116 116 117 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 164 Write 117 Mixed 84.9 SusWrite 114 154% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 5.9 4K Mixed 0.8 234% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 63%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 112GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 124 113 116 116 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 133 Write 129 Mixed 20 SusWrite 119 130% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 39% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3000C16-8GISB F4-3200C16-8GTZR F4-3000C16-8GISB 32GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	95.4% Outstanding	MC Read 35.8 MC Write 38 MC Mixed 30.5 99% 34.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 38 SC Mixed 25.2 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 95.4% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	120	27"	1280 720	SAM0F58 C27JG5x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,448 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,852x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,479x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,387x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	512x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	498x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	441x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	355x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	260x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	222x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	276x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	241x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	182x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 99% - Outstanding

Total price: $792

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16